Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Non-cloned [cd]tors
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Non-cloned [cd]tors
- To: dhandly@xxxxxxxxxx, jason@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Non-cloned [cd]tors
- From: Dennis Handly <dhandly@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:56:42 -0800 (PST)
>From: Jason Merrill <jason@xxxxxxxxxx>
>What is the name of that group? That seems like something the ABI ought
>to specify.
Yes, unfortunately.
We just picked what we did before when we had entry points and used the
same name when we had separate functions.
Index: 81 Directory Section Name: _ZN3fooC3Ev
Index: 82 Directory Section Name: _ZN3fooD2Ev
Index: 83 Directory Section Name: _ZN3fooD0Ev
Index: 84 Directory Section Name: _ZN3fooD1Ev
Basically, we only had entry points for constructors and not for destructors.
>but the mangling rules aren't part of the language.
Jason
Yes. The extra function in the stack trace is visible.
We do a call instead of a goto.