Re: [cxx-abi-dev] C++0x: mangling of char16_t and char32_t

[Dennis Handly <dhandly@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>From: Jason Merrill <jason@xxxxxxxxxx>
>David Vandevoorde wrote:
>> although I'd prefer something a little more "mnemonical"; 
>> maybe W2 and W4.

Only a few of the others are mnemonic, "i" for int, l, v, b, c, s, f, d.

>It seems that this issue wasn't discussed in the DFP mangling meeting. 
>I like Daveed's suggestion; anyone disagree?
Jason

My only suggestion is to use the "D" extension.
Possibly Dt and Dj from the corresponding unsigned short and unsigned int.