Re: [cxx-abi-dev] C++0x: mangling of char16_t and char32_t

[Jason Merrill <jason@xxxxxxxxxx>]

David Vandevoorde wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Doug Gregor wrote:
> > We don't have a mangling for the C++0x char16_t or char32_t types. It
> > has been suggested that we use 'k' for char16_t and 'q' for char32_t.
> > Does that seem reasonable?
>
> Fine by me, although I'd prefer something a little more "mnemonical"; 
> maybe W2 and W4.

It seems that this issue wasn't discussed in the DFP mangling meeting. 
I like Daveed's suggestion; anyone disagree?

Jason