Re: [cxx-abi-dev] C++0x: mangling of char16_t and char32_t
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cxx-abi-dev] C++0x: mangling of char16_t and char32_t
- To: Doug Gregor <doug.gregor@xxxxxxxxx>, cxx-abi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [cxx-abi-dev] C++0x: mangling of char16_t and char32_t
- From: David Vandevoorde <daveed@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:08:51 -0400
On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Doug Gregor wrote:
We don't have a mangling for the C++0x char16_t or char32_t types. It
has been suggested that we use 'k' for char16_t and 'q' for char32_t.
Does that seem reasonable?
Fine by me, although I'd prefer something a little more "mnemonical";
maybe W2 and W4.
Daveed