Re: [c++-pthreads] Re: [SPAM] - Re: [c++-pthreads] Re: FW: RE: Re: I'm Lost - Email found in subject

[Ted Baker <baker@xxxxxxxxxx>]

You may feel that way, Alexander, but I assume you are just
enjoying being playfully provocative.

You know well that insistence on a POSIX C++ API (or, say, an API
for any other language) that implicitly imposes implementation
requirements on implementations of the POSIX C API is a sure way
to kill this project politically.

--Ted

On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 09:27:29AM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> 
> Ted Baker <baker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
> > It seems to me that if you try to layer a C++ API on top of the C
> > API, this limitation will catch you.
> 
> That's just wrong way to layer. C API should be layered on top of
> the C++ stuff.
> 
> http://www.codesourcery.com/archives/c++-pthreads/msg00465.html
> 
> regards,
> alexander.