Re: [c++-pthreads] What are the real issues?

[Richard Henderson <rth@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:48:13PM -0800, Nathan Myers wrote:
> This is an example of proposed semantics (fortunately vetoed) that 
> would have corrupted the process state, making the unwind pointless.

Only with stupid C++ users using catch-all when they should have been
using destructors in the first place.  But that's another debate.


r~