C++ and posix threads
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
C++ and posix threads
- To: c++-pthreads@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: C++ and posix threads
- From: Jean-Marc Bourguet <jm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:52:50 +0100
I feel confused. I wonder what is the context of the discussion
and especially the constraints or the liberties we assume from
an implementation. Shoult it
- need the collaboration of the pthread library or be implementable
as wrapper around an existing pthread library?
- allow modifications to the C interface visible from C or not?
- allow modifications to the C interface visible from C++ or not?
Answering those questions will more or less strongly constraints the rest
of the discussion.
I didn't saw these issues discussed in the archive (if I missed them please
point me to the discussion) and it seems to me that people are assuming
different positions on them (Ted Baker seems to assume that it will be
a wrapper around an existing pthread library without modifications seen
to C code while Nathan Myers's proposition to return an ECANCELED error
imply afaik the collaboration of the pthread library and modification
to the C interface and Alexander Terekhov is apparently somewhere in between
them along this space).
Yours,
--
Jean-Marc