Re: [arm-gnu] Access to volatile bit-fields

To: arm-gnu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [arm-gnu] Access to volatile bit-fields
From: 42Bastian <list-bastian.schick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:46:06 +0200

AmAm 31.08.2010 10:04, schrieb Ryan Lishman:

> Not pretty either way ... the best solution would be an ABI compliant
> compiler. Anxiously, we wait.

Sorry to say this: The best solution would be to not use bit fields at all.

When it comes to hardware I strongly discourage the use of bit fields.

-- 
42Bastian
+
| http://www.sciopta.com
| Fastest direct message passing kernel.
| IEC61508 certified.
+

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [arm-gnu] Access to volatile bit-fields
  - From: zakharov

References:
- [arm-gnu] Access to volatile bit-fields
  - From: Ryan Lishman
- Re: [arm-gnu] Access to volatile bit-fields
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- RE: [arm-gnu] Access to volatile bit-fields
  - From: Ryan Lishman
- RE: [arm-gnu] Access to volatile bit-fields
  - From: zakharov
- RE: [arm-gnu] Access to volatile bit-fields
  - From: Ryan Lishman

Prev by Date: [arm-gnu] Regarding Entry Point in Codesourcery Assembler code
Next by Date: Re: [arm-gnu] Regarding Entry Point in Codesourcery Assembler code
Previous by thread: RE: [arm-gnu] Access to volatile bit-fields
Next by thread: Re: [arm-gnu] Access to volatile bit-fields
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread