Re: [arm-gnu] GCC Testsuite
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [arm-gnu] GCC Testsuite
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [arm-gnu] GCC Testsuite
- From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:54:51 +0530
Hi Mitchell,
1. The Binaries are from you only.
2. we made a set up to check gcctestsuite on target, and running using
# runtest --tool_exec arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc --tool gcc
--target_board=myboard_sshscp_arm
command.
3. Here is my target_board file
***************************************************************************************************************************
load_generic_config "unix"
process_multilib_options ""
# Network address of board
set_board_info hostname 10.10.89.19
set_board_info username root
set_board_info shell_prompt "dank2>"
# For DejaGnu 1.4.3 and above; DejaGnu 1.4.2.x (Debian 3.0) ignores
these settings!
set_board_info rsh_prog /usr/bin/ssh
set_board_info rcp_prog /usr/bin/scp
*************************************************************************
Pls suggest if any modification is required.
Regards
Naveen
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> naveen yadav wrote:
>
>> # of expected passes 36908
>> # of unexpected failures 1304
>> # of unexpected successes 3
>> # of expected failures 90
>> # of unresolved testcases 8683
>> # of unsupported tests 474
>> Executing on host: arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -v (timeout = 300)
>>
>> So which is most critical for stability of Toolchain
>
> Are these actually our binaries, or did you rebuild them from source?
>
> The output above is meaningless on its own. First, the largely number
> of "unresolved testcases" probably means something is wrong with the
> test environment, or the system itself. Second, the failures can come
> from problems with your hardware, kernel, or test procedures. Finally,
> some tests will fail due to known issues -- but are not marked XFAIL in
> the testsuite. It takes quite a lot of knowledge and experience to
> interpret the test logs to determine exactly which case things fall.
>
> Why are you running these tests? What is it that you are trying to
> figure out?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Mark Mitchell
> CodeSourcery
> mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (650) 331-3385 x713
>